Dept. of Biochemistry & Organic Chemistry
|
|
Figure 1. Outline of stepwise synthesis by enzyme-afforded catalysis. Stereospecific hydrolytic ring opening of substituted epoxides catalyzed by epoxide hydrolase generates vicinal diols amenable to oxidation by diol dehydrogenases. The possible range of hydroxy carbonyl products shown in the outline may readily be further extended by derivatizations in either enzyme-catalyzed reaction steps or by organic synthesis. |
Enzyme Catalysts: To produce a diversity of enzyme catalysts of differing substrate specificities we perform genetic engineering of existing enzymes. Properties such as high catalytic effiencies and stereoselectivity are selected for during the directed evolution. We are at present working on engineering a plant epoxide hydrolase, StEH1, and a diol dehydrogenase from E. coli, FucO. Both enzymes are potentially highly stereospecific in their actions and therefore expected to produce products of enriched enantiomeric excess [4-6].
Epoxide hydrolases StEH1 has shown to be a highly suitable enzyme catalyst. The enzyme is stereospecific, easy to produce, structurally sturdy after mutagenesis and valuable structure/function data have been gathered [4, 9-13]. We study the enzymology of StEH1 in combination with production of new epoxide hydrolase-based catalysts by directed evolution to...
- establish structure/function relationships of enzyme-catalyzed epoxide ring opening reactions to guide design and generation of new stereospecific biocatalysts.
- isolate new specific biocatalysts with desired functional and physicochemical properties.
- diversify the catalytic repertoire of StEH1 by introduction of synthetic auxiliary active-site groups in combination with directed evolution.
A diol dehydrogenase from Escherichia coli, propanediol oxidoreductase (FucO), oxidizes (S)-1,2-propane diol into the corresponding aldehyde. This enzyme belongs to the iron-dependent class III group of alcohol dehydrogenases [6]. The tertiary structure of the enzyme reveals an accessible substrate binding site adapted for binding of low-molecular weight diols such as its natural substrate (Fig. 2). The structure, however, also invites to manipulation through directed evolution to generate enzyme forms which may accommodate also larger substrates such as aromatic diols, as exemplified in Fig. 1.
|
|
| Figure 2. Active site of FucO. Catalysis depends on an iron (II) ion (orange) tightly bound through coordination with protein side-chains. The entry form the dinucleotide cofactor (yellow) is from the left in the picture, whereas the diol substrate (blue) enters through the channel from the right. A narrow “waist” in this channel prevents the entry of larger diols into the active site. By random mutagenesis of indicated residues (red) lining the active-site entry, the channel will be widened to allow for binding and oxidation of also larger diols, such as phenylethyl and phenylpropyl diols formed from epoxide hydrolase reactions. (The image was created from the atomic coordinates in 1RRM). |
Our studies on FucO aims to...
- establish structure/function relationships of enzyme-catalyzed oxidation of vicinal diols to guide design and generation of new stereospecific dehydrogenases.
- isolate new FucO enzyme variants, by directed evolution, with substrate specificities which can be employed to act on diol derivatives produced from StEH1-catalyzed hydrolysis of corresponding epoxides.
1. Urlacher, V.B. & Schmid, R.D. (2006) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 156.
2. Matsumura, S., Soeda, Y. & Toshima, K. (2006) Appl. Micribiol. Biotechnol. 70 12.
3. García-Urdiales, E., Alfonso, I. & Gotor, V. (2005) Chem. Rev. 105, 313.
4. Lindberg, D., Gogoll, A. & Widersten, M. (2008) FEBS J. 275, 3609.
5. Monterde, M.I., Lombard, M., Archelas, A., Cronin, A. Arand, M. & Furstoss, R. (2004) Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 15, 2801.
6. Obradors, N., Cabiscol, E., Aguilar, J. & Ros, J. (1998) Eur. J. Biochem. 258, 207.
7. Steinreiber, A. & Faber, K. (2001) Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12, 552.
8. Archelas, A. & Furstoss, R. (2001) Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 5, 112.
9. Elfström, L.T. & Widersten, M. (2005) Biochem. J. 290, 633.
10. Elfström, L.T. & Widersten, M. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 205.
12. Thomaeus, A., Carlsson, J., Åqvist, J. & Widersten, M. (2007) Biochemistry 46, 2466.
13. Thomaeus, A., Naworyta, A., Mowbray, S.L. & Widersten, M. (2008) Protein Sci. 17, 1275.


